|
|
|
|
Structure
|
Peak Occupancy
|
Gallons / Person
|
Water Demand (gpd)
|
Houses
|
20
|
100
|
2000
|
Bungalows
|
60
|
50
|
3000
|
Bungalows
|
20
|
50
|
1000
|
Restaurant
|
|
|
300
|
Total
|
|
|
5300
|
Property
|
Daily Allocation (gpd)
|
Equivalent Flow rate (gpm)
|
[----------------]
|
2000
|
1.4
|
Lot 1 Lana
|
1000
|
0.7
|
Lot 2 Lana
|
500
|
0.35
|
Lot 3
|
500
|
0.35
|
Lot 4
|
500
|
0.35
|
TOTAL
|
4500
|
3.15
|


Figure 4. [----------------] Water Intake

Spring Number
|
Description
|
Elevation
|
Flow (gpm)
|
1
|
Upper Quebrada Amor
|
280 feet
|
20 gpm
|
2
|
[----------------] Intake
|
260 feet
|
5 gpm
|
3
|
Quebrada Terciopelo
|
220 feet
|
4 gpm
|
4
|
Quebrada Escondido
|
140 feet
|
4 gpm
|
5
|
Quebrada La Pansa
|
110 feet
|
5 gpm
|
Table 2. Springs identified during the survey of Finca [-----------]. See Figure 2 for spring locations.
On the basis of the abundant water resources identified, OWW has concluded that the property contains the potential to both satisfy its own water demands and provide a community-based water system to its neighbors
Drinking Water Distribution Alternatives
Building Site and Structure
|
Elevation
|
Hidden Plateau: Hotel
and Restaurant
|
320 feet
|
Small Plateau: residence
|
240
|
La Pansa: residence
|
120 feet
|
La Fila: residence
|
80 – 100 feet
|
Bungalows
|
40 – 60 feet
|
Off site
|
20 – 60 feet
|
On the basis of the
stream flow observed in Quebrada Amor, it is not feasible to deploy a year-round
hydroelectric power generation capacity without incurring unacceptable
environmental impact. However, the
rainy season hydroelectric potential of two of the watersheds examined is very
promising. Owing to the great
fluctuation in flow and the relatively small flow available, direct-AC power
generation is completely out of the question.
However, a DC power generation system would provide a reliable source of
power to augment the solar power that would be required during summer months.
Without
knowing winter-time flows of the watersheds in question, it is impossible to
specify the amount of energy that is potentially available. However, if we assume: 1) that Quebrada Amor doubles in
average flow during the rainy season; 2) that a pipeline is used that takes
advantage of 160 feet of head; 3) that the generating source efficiency is 40%,
and 4) that 50% of the flow is diverted for power generation, then power
generation expectations are around 5.5 kW/day, enough power to sustain the
energy demands of one full-size, fully equipped residence or up to 10 bungalows
equipped with lights and fans.
Similarly,
if Quebrada Escondido is tapped for hydro, then an additional 5.5 kW may be
possible, though this would reduce the wintertime stream flow remaining in the
watershed to around 5 gpm, that is, about the same as its summertime flow.
Because Quebrada Escondido is a tributary of Quebrada Amor, it is
possible to use two pipelines to boost the water delivery feeding a single
Pelton wheel located downstream of these two channels.
In order to capitalize on the great variation in expected flow, we
propose a four-nozzle variable-flow adjustable system that can generate greater
power when there is more water and that could capitalize on very low flows to
generate at least some energy for the project.
Eleven kW of power is enough energy, for example to easily supply 14
well-appointed bungalows, a freezer, and a washing machine for the lower portion
of the property. As a point of
comparison, in order to generate 11 kW daily using solar panels, would require
22 100-watt solar panels, based on 5 hours of daily insolation and more during
the winter season.
Confirmation
of winter-time hydro feasibility will necessarily involve a wet-season survey to
confirm flow rates of the two target streams.
Political
Considerations
One
of the concerns of the prospective developers is the fact that the [----------------]
presently derives its water from Quebrada Amor within the boundaries of the
property under consideration. The
crude surface water intake (figure 3) is capable of withdrawing an amount of
water far in excess of what the [----------------] actually needs for potable
water supply, irrigation, and pool water supply.
In the absence of competing interests, [----------------] presently uses
this water without any concern for water conservation, evinced by the dependence
upon continual replacement of pool water and the presence of a fountain that
shoots water into the air fifteen feet or so.
However, the owner of the [----------------] has grown accustomed to his
water-consumption practices. Moreover,
there is a precedent in Costa Rican water law that would provide the [----------------]
a legal basis for contesting any decision by the prospective owners to modify
the existing intake or pipeline. While
the landowners would most likely prevail in a legal contest, given the [----------------]’s
contractual entitlement to only 2000 gallons per day, this process could consume
years, engender bad blood among neighbors, and effectively make development
plans more difficult to realize. Clearly,
it is in the prospective owners´ best interest to convince the [----------------]
to participate in whatever overall development plan is settled upon in exchange
for the guarantee of sustained, high quality water supply in perpetuity.
An additional concern
are the seven subjacent residential properties that all have a need for potable
water supply. After consideration
of all possible alternatives, a solution was devised that:
1) provides the property
owners with all the water they will need for their development; 2)
provides the [----------------] with a dependable source of water;
3) Inhibits the [----------------] from taking more water from their
present intake than is required for potable water supply and light irrigation;
and 4) employs the use of a hydraulic ram pump for water displacement, obviating
the energy input requirements of an electrical pump; and 5) provides water
supply for neighbors that enables recovery of up to $35,000 of the cost of
system implementation. The system
under proposal is illustrated in Figure 6 and discussed in detail below.
The system depends
entirely upon a single source of potable water.
An infiltration gallery installed at Spring 1 will feed a pipeline that
charges a hydraulic ram pump a small way downstream of Terry’s present intake. The available spring flow of 20 gpm will provide delivery of
2 gpm to the distribution tank located about 90 feet higher than the structure
to be built on Hidden Plateau. The
remaining 18 gpm will charge the distribution tank adjacent to the ram pump for
delivery of water to La Fila, Abdelí’s house, the bungalows, and also the
neighboring properties as shown in Figure 6.
Overflow from the Quebrada Amor storage/distribution tank will be
returned to the stream.
Under this scenario,
the stream will be dry from the intake at Spring 1 until the [----------------]
intake, which is fed by a 5 gpm spring, giving the [----------------] 5 gpm to
work with year round.
Immediately below this existing intake the overflow from the distribution
tank would be returned to the stream, ensuring a year round flow of at least 15
gpm at the driest time of the year and assuming full utilization by downstream
users. This guarantees that the
stream will never be depleted of water due to potable water withdrawals.
Most importantly, it ensures that the [----------------] will never be
able to dry out the creek to satisfy the indiscriminate water usage to which it
is presently accustomed.
The two gpm water
delivery to the top of Hidden Plateau is enough flow to satisfy the water needs
of 29 full time residents assuming the very liberal stateside standard for water
demand calculations of 100 gallons per person per day.
In order to ensure that all downstream residences and businesses (Hidden
Plateau, Second Plateau, and La Pansa) have adequate water during peak demands,
the storage tank should be designed for a capacity of not less that 10,000
gallons.
Water from the Hidden
Plateau tank will be delivered by gravity feed to two considerably smaller
pressure diffusion tanks located in series in order to provide the lower
elevation Small Plateau and La Pansa building sites with optimal domestic water
pressure.
Neighboring
homeowners (as well as lower elevation Finca Amor structures) can all be
supplied water from the Quebrada Amor water collection tank.
A pipeline would carry this water down the stream and then along the
road. Homeowners in the area would
then have the option of tapping into the pipeline for $4-5000 hookup cost.
Metering of the water usage will provide a means of ensuring that these
users do not exceed a monthly water usage quota to be established as part of a
set of system operational guidelines. Since
there are seven property owners (other than the [----------------]) that need
water now or will in the near future, this represents $28-35,000 toward
offsetting the capital costs of installation.
While
there is enough water during dry conditions to sustain a modest hydroelectric
generation potential, exploitation of this resource would require all but drying
up the creek during summer months from the proposed intake all the way to the
proposed generation station at Don Abdelí’s house.
OWW considers this to constitute an excessive environmental impact.
However, a winter-time hydroelectric system is entirely reasonable and
can be implemented at a negligible impact to the environment.
As previously mentioned this will require a winter-time survey of water
flows to specify the upper range of wattage that can be generated.
We are confident based on the survey undertaken, discussion with Don
Abdelí and our experience, that a minimum of 11 kW daily can be generated
throughout six months of the year.
The
proposed hydroelectric system consists of two 2” pipelines on Quebrada Amor
and Quebrada Escondido as shown in Figure 6.
These pipelines would join at the confluence of the two streams, and a
three inch pipeline would carry the water to the proposed generation point at
Don Abdelí’s house. The
deployment of a four nozzle manifold would enable power generation to be
optimized according to the flow in the stream and through the use of valves.
In this manner, the
generation system would have the flexibility to supply power in the range of 5
kW/ day – 25 kW/day, the former during dryer times and the latter during storm
runoff.
Before a formal cost
estimate can be prepared, additional work is necessary.
This work and associated costs is summarized below.
1) Winter-time hydro survey, system design and engineering
$ 1,000
2) Water quality analysis
$ 400
TOTAL
$1,400
The final design and
engineering will provide the final details of such other information necessary
to detail costs as: 1) pipeline
lengths; 2) number and size of distribution and pressure diffusion
tanks; 3) pump sizes; 3) filtration requirements; and 4) Pelton generator size
and configuration.
There is
unquestionably enough water on the Finca Amor property to supply the prospective
owners with all the water necessary for all the project elements being planned.
Moreover, there is enough water to continue to supply [----------------]
with all the water necessary for its reasonable potable water consumption, and
there is enough water to supply up to 10 neighboring properties with residential
water supply with modest irrigation. There
is enough water that after supplying all those needs, the drop in water flow in
the stream will not even be noticeable.
There is not enough
water during the dry season to generate hydroelectric power without incurring an
unacceptable environmental impact. However,
during winter months, the owners can expect a sustained hydroelectric power
generation of 11 kW per day.
Perhaps the most
attractive incentive of the comprehensive solution proposed in this document is
an avenue to finance a substantial portion of the costs with hookups to
downstream neighbors that need a dependable domestic water supply for their
residences and at the same time provide goodwill among neighbors by supplying
the invaluable resource of water.
Should the purchase
of the property proceed and should the new owners elect to proceed with
engineering and design, OWW recommends that the Osa Group approach the other
owners about buying into the system. These
neighbors are all friends of the three OWW principals and most are clients of
one or more of the five Osa Group companies.
Unless the
prospective owners would like to move faster, a reasonable time frame for
completion of winter time hydro survey and design and engineering of the system
appears to be in October at the time of the closing of the property purchase
should the prospective owners decide to buy the property.
Under this time frame, construction could proceed at any time thereafter.
[1]
While 100 gpd/person is reasonable in the United States, this includes
allotments for car-washing, irrigation, washing machines, dishwashers, and
in general a water use rate that is not typically matched by conventional
wilderness developments in Costa Rica.
This figure should, therefore, be considered as an extremely liberal
value, particularly if water-conservation fixtures are used.
Home Mission Hydroelectric Power Potable Water Sanitation Contact Us Ask OWW